Data Warehousing vs. Data Lakes: Key Differences

In today’s data-driven world, data is more important than ever. Therefore, data is used by organizations to make business decisions, improve operations, and to generate valuable insights. At any given time, there is an exponential growth in data volumes, and companies can’t afford to lose time and hinder their progress by having a robust data infrastructure that stores, processes, and analyzes all the data.

There are two popular data storage and processing solutions: data warehouses and data lakes. On the face of things, they seem to do the same thing, agglomerating critical business data into one place for analytics and reporting. But there are some basic differences between the two approaches.

Understanding these key distinctions is essential to determine the best choice for your organization's data architecture needs. This article provides an in-depth comparison of data warehousing and data lake concepts and typical use cases where each technology shines.

Image: Freepik

What is a Data Warehouse?

A data warehouse is a centralized repository of integrated data from multiple sources organized to enable business reporting and data analysis. It contains structured, filtered data that has already been processed for a specific purpose, such as analytics or business intelligence.

The data warehousing service architecture typically consists of:

1. Raw data from multiple sources like operational databases, CRM systems, etc.
2. An Extract, Transform, Load (ETL) layer that cleans, filters, aggregates and integrates data.
3. A structured database using a schema that organizes data for optimal query performance.
4. Metadata that defines the structure, processing, and lineage of the imported data.
5. BI tools, SQL clients, and other analytics applications to analyze the warehouse data.

Key features

1. Structured. Data is modeled dimensionally for ease of access and analytics. Relationships and metrics are predefined.
2. Integrated. Data from disparate sources is aggregated and correlated.
3. Time-variant. Data is loaded incrementally to track changes over time.
4. Non-volatile. Data is persistent, read-only reference data for reliable point-in-time analysis.
5. Subject-oriented. Data is organized by subject (customers, products, sales, etc.) for convenience in conducting business reports.

Data warehouses provide refined, governed data optimized for analysis and decision-making. By storing consistent snapshots of information over longer periods, they enable businesses to analyze historical patterns and trends.

What is a Data Lake?

A data lake is a centralized repository that allows you to store all your structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data at any scale. Unlike the structured approach of data warehouses, data lakes can ingest data in raw format as it's generated.

Data lakes can also serve as a critical foundation for advanced applications like computer vision software development services, where vast amounts of raw image and video data can be stored and processed for training and deploying machine learning models.

The concept behind data lakes is to dump all available data into a single place rather than forcing it into inflexible schemas. This makes it easier for data scientists and analysts to access and experiment with many data types and sources.

The architecture of a data lake includes:

1. Data sources - IoT devices, websites, mobile apps, SaaS platforms, social media and more.
2. A scalable cloud storage repository that can hold vast volumes of data.
3. Data ingestion tools to load streaming or batch data.
4. Metadata to catalog data elements stored in the lake.
5. Access and processing options like SQL, machine learning, and analytics.

Key Features

1. Schema-on-read. Data remains in its original format rather than mapped to strict schemas. The structure is interpreted at analysis time.
2. Massively scalable. Distributed architecture scales out to handle any volume of data.
3. Flexible data structures. Handles structured, semi-structured, and unstructured data like text, images, and video.
4. Accessible and auditable. All data is easily reached for multiple analytical purposes.
5. Cost-effective. Leverages low-cost object storage rather than traditional data warehouses.

In essence, data lakes offer highly flexible, low-cost storage for big data from any source, enabling advanced analytics and machine learning techniques. The tradeoffs are that data requires heavy transformation before analysis, and data lakes lack the governance of a curated data warehouse.

Key Differences Between Data Lakes and Data Warehouses

While both technologies hold large repositories of enterprise data, they are optimized for different use cases with some fundamental contrasts.

Let's explore some of the key differences in more detail:

Data Structure and Organization

Data warehouses are used to store highly structured, interrelated data, that is optimized for analysis. It includes normalized, filtered, and error-free data aggregated to provide historical context.

Data lakes, on the other hand, store raw granular transactions and events in their original format. It provides support for unstructured text, images, video, and more in a massively scalable way.

Schema Design

In data warehouses, data architects model data relationships and performance-enhancing aggregations upfront, based on intended analytics use cases. It is this schema-on-write approach that allows querying to be fast and efficient.

Data lakes are schema on read which means structure is interpreted dynamically only at the time of analysis. This provides flexibility in data storage first, and then how to use it, but at the cost of additional processing overhead at query time.

Metadata

Metadata is essential to track data lineage, quality, and meaning in both systems. However, data warehouse metadata is exceptionally rich, with precise descriptions that enable self-service business users.

Data lakes have basic metadata and classifiers to organize content. However, specific attributes must be determined at query run time before analysis.

Use Cases

Data warehouses rock at standard reporting and dashboards for business users, using predefined metrics and entities. Reliable historical comparisons depend on conformed dimensions that have meaning over time.

By extending data lakes to include endless exploration of granular details in raw data, it can uncover new growth opportunities. In addition to enabling analytics on advanced levels such as machine learning, segmentation, predictive modeling, and more.

Agility

Data modeling for data warehouses is very meticulous and is based on known requirements. Rigid and disruptive to downstream systems, new data feeds, and schema changes are.

With data lakes, new data sources and types can be quickly ingested without having to slow or affect the existing analytic tools. They are easily flexible and can meet emerging requirements.

Skillset

Business analysts who do not have deep technical skills can take the ‘trusted, refined data’ directly from the data warehouses. SQL and BI tools use user-friendly data marts tailored to departments.

Data lakes need data scientists and engineers to process data, perform machine learning operations, and develop analytics applications. To read the storage format is also technically required.

Performance and Cost

The highly structured optimization of data warehouses delivers quick response times for analyzing large data volumes, essential for customer-facing analytics. However, the infrastructure requires significant capital and maintenance costs.

Data lakes provide instantly scalable storage and processing for any data volume at a fraction of the price. However, query performance is slower due to reading raw data and on-demand structure. Caching, indexing, and partitioning can help overcome this.

Data Governance

Data governance is intrinsic to data warehousing disciplines. Rigorous data quality, security, and metadata make this the trusted data foundation for critical business decisions.

Data lakes, by nature, lack persistent schemas, definitions, quality checks, and access controls. This makes them more suitable as a landing zone for experimental analytics before curating data into downstream systems.

When to Use Each Approach?

With distinct strengths and focus areas, data warehouses and data lakes can play complementary roles in a modern data architecture. Here are typical usage scenarios that favor one over the other:

Data Warehouses For:

1. Customer-facing analytics and standardized KPI reporting.
2. Financial analysis and auditing.
3. Operational reporting on transactions and key events.
4. Master data management and data cleansing.
5. Strict service level agreements for users.
6. Querying high-quality, trusted data.

Data Lakes For:

1. Landing and experimenting with new, fast-changing data sources.
2. Data science algorithms, predictive modeling, and machine learning.
3. Analyzing sentiment, text mining, and image analysis.
4. Clickstream analytics and funnel analysis.
5. Affordable storage and agile access for new initiatives.
6. Frequent ETL and schema changes.

For many enterprises, the best practice is to deploy both technologies to achieve the best of both worlds. Cleansed, filtered production data in a structured data warehouse provides performance for critical business reporting, while dynamic raw data in an unstructured data lake fuels advanced analytics and innovation.

Conclusion

Modern data architectures use data warehouses and data lakes to fulfill different but complementary roles. Structured data, with high performance, analytics, and business reporting environments, are ideal for data warehouses to operate in, with data integrity and reliability. In contrast, data lakes enable flexible, scalable, and cost-effective unstructured raw data to support advanced analytics and machine learning applications. The two approaches can be used to combine the strengths of each and organize organizations to balance the governance and the agility to meet a variety of business and technical needs.