As an independent management consultant and president of Sociable
Media, Cliff Atkinson (pictured to the left) advises
the senior leadership of some of the world's largest companies
on how they can engage the organizational phenomenon called PowerPoint.
These companies are beginning to understand PowerPoint as more
than just a presentation tool, and are seeking answers to deeper
questions about its organizational use: How well does PowerPoint
articulate and retain intellectual assets? Do organizational
policies help or hinder effective PowerPoint communication? Are
the right tools, resources and training in place to support a
healthy communications ecology?
Geetesh:
Cliff:
Cliff, tell me more about yourself and what you do.
Many organizations are at the point where PowerPoint has
been completely absorbed into their cultures, yet, as with
any technology, problems always arise from its use. I help
organizations identify and fix those problems as an independent
management consultant. In a recent engagement, the board
of directors of one of the world's biggest companies realized
that the PowerPoints they were seeing were too complex and
overwhelming. They recognized that as a strategic problem,
because they want their organization to be more transparent
and simpler to understand. So they asked the CEO to fix the
problem, and the company then hired me to help out. I wrote
a white paper that analyzed their situation and made recommendations,
and then created a new system of tools, resources, training
materials and guidelines that has improved the way the company
uses the tool. The program actually won an award for the
improvement it brought to the organization.
Geetesh:
Cliff:
Many organizations consider creating PowerPoint presentations
as easy as creating a Word document - many times, it is
not feasible to get a presentation designed professionally
because it's needed in another hour. How can one balance
these unseemingly related issues?
We all have to grow as people and organizations, and PowerPoint
calls on all of us to develop skills that nobody may have
taught us. Just as learning the alphabet and writing a paragraph
are part of everyone's basic communications skillset, today's
skillset includes the basics of design, composition, color
theory, and using a grid. And beyond that, we need to learn
the art and science of using projected media as a tool to
awaken understanding and facilitate conversation. All of
this is possible, just not "easy", and that's a
core behavioral problem with PowerPoint.
Because everyone is busy, we all understandably want the
path of least resistance, and "easy" in PowerPoint
means we default to the template approach. But that "easy" hour
of work often produces PowerPoint that is very "hard" for
audiences to understand. We actually need to do the reverse:
We have to work "harder" to make PowerPoint "easier" for
audiences, which in turn makes it "easier" for
us and our organizations to achieve our goals.
Geetesh:
Cliff:
How do you typically use PowerPoint?
I use it as a hybrid media tool, to write, design, speak
and listen.
I force PowerPoint to do things it wasn't designed to do,
and stretch myself to learn skills I don't know. I've used
the tool to write business proposals, create print and projected
training materials, and produced a music video. At the moment
I'm writing a book about PowerPoint, in PowerPoint: the end
product will be available in print, projector and browser
forms. I can't believe how much fun this software can be.
Geetesh:
Cliff:
Death by PowerPoint - you have so much content on your
site with comments from experts. How do you feel about
the whole thing?
The experts I've interviewed all agree that the current
PowerPoint approach has problems, but that the criticism
that has been voiced by the writer Edward Tufte in his essay "The
Cognitive Style of PowerPoint" also has its problems.
The fact that the whole issue of PowerPoint has been gaining
attention is a good thing, because the first step in solving
any problem is to recognize you have it in the first place.
The second step is to analyze it, and the third is to solve
it. We're still in step 2. The solutions to the problems
will emerge from thinkers who accept PowerPoint as a significant
communications tool, that there are many smart people who
use it, and that we have the capabilities to learn and do
better.
Geetesh:
Cliff:
PowerPoint gets into the epicenter of the presentation sphere - all sorts
of media emanates from it including online rich media, Dynamic HTML,
multimedia CDs, kiosk style presentations and more. How well placed
is PowerPoint to accept this challenge?
PowerPoint is a versatile tool with a set of qualities that
no other media has. It even extends unwillingly into the
realms of print and live corporate event productions. The
fact that it is so easy to use, and that everyone has it,
will continue to force its evolution. Its core potential
is actually not on its visual side - its future lay in innovations
that force visuals and the written word to integrate more
tightly together.
Geetesh:
Cliff:
How important are presentation skills beyond PowerPoint
- does one need professional training to enhance skills?
It is against life to stay stagnant. And that applies to
PowerPoint too. We have to continually learn, adapt, and
expand ourselves in the context of our circumstances. Today
that means moving beyond a "presentation" mindset
into a "facilitation" mindset. Yes, even PowerPoint
can be a tool that can inspire dialogue, break down old thinking,
and create a constructive context for debate and resolution.
We all have to figure out how to break outside of our current
thinking and develop these new skills.
And if no one has a training program developed yet, we have
to figure out how to do it ourselves. We can't wait another
16 years to innovate.
Geetesh:
Cliff:
You are involved with Toastmasters - how much can a presenter benefit
from being a member of an organization like Toastmasters?
PowerPoint desperately needs Toastmasters, and Toastmasters
desperately needs PowerPoint, and I hope the two will come
together at some point because the union would be quite productive.
Toastmasters can provide PowerPoint with a context where
you regularly meet with your peers and get constructive feedback
on how you're doing as a communicator.
We all need to hear "your PowerPoint was boring" from
other people who want to help you figure out how to improve
it. And it's better to hear this from friendly colleagues
than from your boss or your clients. Toastmasters also needs
PowerPoint because the ethos of the organization remains
in the 1970s, and incorporating effective use of PowerPoint
into its central methodology could quickly advance it to
the 21st century.
It wasn't until recently that the Toastmasters basic manual
even included mention of computer-aided presentations, let
alone specifically introducing exercises that teach people
how to use it well. Although a new Toastmasters brochure
includes pictures of computers on the cover, there are few
if any Toastmaster clubs that accurately reflect the degree
to which PowerPoint is actually used to communicate in the
corporate world. There is an opportunity here for Toastmasters
to skip beyond all of the PowerPoint mistakes we've made
the past 16 years, and adopt state-of-the-art practices that
will evolve both speaking and the organization itself. There's
no doubt that the combination of PowerPoint and Toastmasters
would be much greater than the sum of its parts.